Best Way to Know the Khula Process in Pakistan
Remarry With The Same Husband After The Khula:
The remarriage with same husband
of course would be subject to performance of another Nikah after the khula
procedure in Pakistan and khula process in Pakistan. Section 7(6) also allows
such re-union without halala in Pakistan, there is no restrained either in the
Muslim Family laws Ordinance or in the injunction of Quran and Sunnah not to
allow prayer of the husband for re-union with his wife after khula procedure in
Pakistan and procedure of khula in Pakistan when she is ready to live again as
wife of the husband within the limits of God." Section 7(6)does not debar
a wife whose marriage has been terminated by khula
procedure in Pakistan and khula process in Pakistan effective under
this section from re marrying the same husband, without halala in Pakistan with a third person, unless such termination
is for the third time so effective. Right to re-marry same husband exists for
spouse. Right to re-marry same husband, without an intervening marriage, unless
khula in Pakistan is effective for three times (doing away with Halala in
Pakistan).
Negatives Talaq al-hasan and its
effect and as such S. 7(6) is contrary to Injunctions of Holy Qur'an and
Sunnah:
Held effectiveness of Talaq is not only
relevant for purpose of re- marriage, but it is also relatable to right to
property such as Will and inheritance and as such dictates of Holy Qur'an and
Sunnah must be strictly adhered to section 6. Marriage before expiry of period
of lddat with woman before lddat is irregular and not void. Section 7(6) read
with Offence of Zina Ordinance, 1979. Alleged abductee who was star witness of
the case, categorically denying that she had been abducted by the co-accused
and not supporting the allegation as leveled in F.I.R. and stating that she
rejoined the co-accused within 90 days before divorce between her and
co-accused had become affected. Question of abduction of accused or commission
of rape with her would not arise even in view of provisions of section 7(6) of
Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, F.I.R. quashed.
List of dowry articles was
not proved. Recovery of maintenance allowance and dowry articles was maintained
in a case. Concurrent findings of Trial Court and appellate Court by which
decree for maintenance of minor son, recovery of dowry articles and maintenance
for iddat period was passed in favor of the wife (respondent)
Husband (petitioner) contended
that list of dowry articles was not proved in accordance with law and same were
taken by wife to her parent's house and the rate of maintenance was beyond his
means. Husband did not refute wife's contention to the extent that dowry was
given to her by her parents but contended that its value was less than what she
claimed. Wife had contended that list of dowry articles was not thumb-marked by
her but her brother had put thumb-impressions and Signatures on it and she had
given full details of the articles and prices thereof in her statement. We provide
the halala in
Pakistan according to the Pakistani law.
Husband's contention that wife took
dowry articles to her father’s house were not substantiated by any cogent
evidence:
Minor's rate of maintenance was
very reasonable and being real son of petitioner, he had unlimited and
unqualified right to get maintenance from his father. Rate of maintenance for
period of iddat in favor of wife was also not excessive. A concurrent finding
of trial court and appellate court below being unexceptional, husband’s
petition was dismissed. Suit for dowry articles and maintenance allowance was
allowed. Petitioner's suit for recovery of dowry articles and maintenance
allowance was decreed by Trial Court to the sum of Rs.280,000 as dowry articles
and Rs.3,000 per month as maintenance allowance. Appellate Court reduced amount
of dowry articles from Rs.280,000 to Rs.50,000 and maintenance allowance from
Rs.3000 to Rs.2000 per month.
Comments
Post a Comment