Best Way Of Court Marriage In Lahore Pakistan

Court Marriage Procedure In Pakistan:

Petitioner was not entitled to claim any maintenance allowance after conducting court marriage procedure in Pakistan and Procedure Of Court Marriage In Pakistan during divorce procedure in Pakistan. Parties had no case at all to invoke Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court to impugn the judgment. Column No. 18 was helpful for bride while making claim of dowry articles to prove case in requirements of Qanun-e- Shahadat. Bride while making claim of dowry articles along with divorce procedure in Pakistan, was required to prove case in requirements of Qanun-e-Shahadat. Nikahnama was required to be proved was partially decreed in the favor of plaintiff. Appeal filed by petitioner was also dismissed in divorce procedure in Pakistan after conducting court marriage procedure in Pakistan. For Court marriage in Lahore Pakistan and court marriage in Lahore nazia law associates is the best place.

 Challenge to courts below had failed to appreciate evidence:

 Affidavit tendered in evidence. Held, It was not possible for any bride, wife to keep record of purchase receipts, prepare list of dowry articles, and obtain signatures from bridegroom, husband. Par. In-laws, of any bride were extended esteem respect and it was considered no insult to prepare dowry list for purposes of obtaining signature from them. Order of family court was changed applying that the plaintiff was entitled for dowery amount fixed depreciation of dowry articles. Suit fonts of baby girl in the childhood start collecting the dowry articles. Recovery of maintenance and prompt dower in shape of gold ornaments entered in Nikahnama or its1alternate value. Dismissal of suit for recovery of maintenance and passing of decree for recovery of prompt dower by Family Court was justified. Husband did not contested the order against him. Held, Defendant had not challenged decree for recovery of dower. Filing of suit by plaintiff for recovery of prompt dower was itself a notice o its demand from defendant and date of its demand would be date of institution of such suit. Defendant had not paid prompt dower to plait,. thus, she had a right to refuse to pay her maintenance from date of its demand till it’s with him till it’s payment to her and he was bound to live payment.

Value of gold ornaments was mentioned:

Value of gold ornaments was mentioned as RS.31,000/- in Nikahnama dated 26-08-2005. Alternate value of such gold would be fixed according to value relevant at the time of institution of suit, which value would be determined by Executing Court. Plaintiff in plaint had claimed Rs.6, 000/- as monthly maintenance, while she in evidence had stated monthly income of defendant to be Rs.460,000/55,000/-. Defendant in his statement had not uttered a single word about his income. Defendant was working in kingdom Saudi Arabia, thus, Rs. 2,000/- per month would be sufficient for plaintiff's maintenance, which he was liable to pay from date of suit till payment of prompt dower to her. Higher Court changed judgments and decrees of both Courts below accordingly. Recovery of property given to wife in lieu of dower amount was valid. Suit for recovery of property given to wife in lieu of dower was justified. Nikah of parties performed in year 2005, while Nikahnama and Meharnama (Dower Deed) was executed in year 2007 in absence of defendant by his brother. Suit decreed by Courts below concurrently.

 Held, Nikah of parties was performed in presence of defendant and his brother. Defendant's brother being a witness of Nikah had signed NIkahnama and admitted in his evidence fixation of dower and his signatures on Meharnama. Defendant had neither Challenged Nikahnama nor Meharnama before filing of suit Objected to their admission in evidence. Plaintiff had established by producing Convincing and plausible evidence. Considered evidence available on record and points raised by defendant. High Court dismissed Constitutional petition in circumstances.  Petitioner failed to prove Nikahnama. Suit for restitution of conjugal rights would be rightly dismissed when plaintiff did not fail to prove Nikahnama nor execution of alleged Kabinnama was proved by plaintiff after following the Divorce procedure in Pakistan.