Best And Latest Procedure Of Divorce In Pakistan
Section 7 of Ordinance
Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961
Respondent No. 2 giving the address of the office of her
advocate in the title of the suit was upheld. Suit for procedure of Divorce in Pakistan was tried. Petitioner seeking
rejection of the suit on this score that correct address by the respondent No.
2 not given as required under sub-rule 2(c) of Rule 4 of Rules, 1965. It was
held that Rule 4(1) provides that in case where family suit is filed by a
female it can also be filed on her behalf by her agent. Nadra divorce certificate in
Pakistan-Cancellation of said certificate. Petitioner divorced his wife and
ninety days period after the pronouncement/sending of notice to the Chairman
Arbitration Council having elapsed. Chairman Arbitration Council, Union Council
concerned issued a Nadra divorce certificate in Pakistan as required under S. 7
of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961. After more than two years of
effectiveness of Talaq, Naib Nazim Union Council cancelled certificate of
effectiveness of Talaq. Petitioner had challenged cancellation of Nadra divorce
certificate in Pakistan contending that Naib Nazim Union Council had no
authority to revoke the earlier certificate of effectiveness of Talaq. On Court
Notice, Nazim of Union Council concerned appeared in Court along with relevant
record and apprised the Court that Naib Nazim who had cancelled Nadra divorce
certificate in Pakistan had died and that he did not own the documents
allegedly having been issued by deceased Naib Nazim.
Certificate of Talaq and divorce :
Petition was disposed of with the
observation that as no record was available with the Union Council regarding
certificate canceling effectiveness of Talaq, it appeared that it had been
manipulated. Even otherwise after a lapse of more than two years, Naib Nazim Union
Council had no authority to revoke the certificate of Talaq. Nadra divorce certificate in Pakistan by the
Chairman, Arbitration Council had been issued in a mechanical way, without
noticing that husband had already divorced her on 15-03-2007. Application by a
divorced wife for grant of maintenance for herself and minors to Chairman,
Arbitration Council was upheld. Certificate by the Chairman, Arbitration
Council had been issued in a mechanical way, without noticing that husband had
already divorced her on 15-03-2007. Tenor of the Certificate issued displayed
that divorced wife was granted maintenance from 01-05-1999 onwards without its
point of culmination, which could not be awarded to divorced wife after the
procedure of divorce in Pakistan. Order of High Court upholding such
certificate was set aside by Supreme Court.
Certificate of Talaq issued on 16-06-1973 by Arbitration Council directed
plaintiff to pay maintenance of $ 3,000 to defendant for lddat period.
Revision
petition against such certificate/orders filed in year 1986 was dismissed by
Collector on 24-05-1988 as barred by time. Suit of declaration filed on
20-06-1989 challenging orders, dated 16-06-1973 and 24-05-1988. Plaintiff had
moved revision petition before Collector after 13 years. Orders of Arbitration
Council and Collector were not void. Suit was dismissed as barred by time.
Spouses belonged to "Shia" sect. Husband gave notice of "Talaq'
to Chairman Arbitration Council to proceed with the procedure of divorce in
Pakistan, who issued notice to the petitioner. Father of petitioner as her
attorney received notice.
Procedure of divorce in Pakistan
Chairman Arbitration Council issued
certificate of effectiveness of divorce. Chairman had no jurisdiction to issue
a certificate declaring effectiveness or otherwise of divorce. Valid procedure
of divorce in Pakistan could take effect only upon the fulfillment of condition
laid down in S. 7 of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance. Marriage tie between the
parties having ended in divorce, petitioner, who was abroad sent first divorce
notice to the wife, duly attested by Consular, Embassy of Pakistan copy of
which was sent to Chairman Union Council. Second and third notices were also
sent and petitioner also appointed his attorney as his representative in
conciliation proceedings. Conciliation proceedings were conducted, but on their
failure, certificate of effectiveness of divorce, were not issued by Chairman
Union Council on the ground that divorce deed received by him was doubtful and
had not been sent through the Embassy. Original divorce deed placed on record
had been attested by Consular, Embassy of Pakistan. Special Power of Attorney
in favor of attorney of petitioner was also attested by Consular, Embassy of
Pakistan. Said documents had negated stand of Chairman Union Council and he had
committed illegality floating on the surface of record in holding that document
of Divorce and Power of Attorney were not attested by the Embassy.
Constitutional petition was allowed and order passed by Chairman Union Council
was set aside, with the result that proceedings of conciliation would be deemed
to be pending before the Chairman, who would decide same afresh within
specified time. Nadra divorce certificate in Pakistan issued by Chairman in
absence of evidence on record.
Certificate about divorce
Certificate about divorce by Talaq issued by
Chairman in absence of evidence on record to prove pronouncement of Talaq by
husband during procedure of divorce in Pakistan would be ineffective qua inheritance
rights of wife after death of husband. Defendant filed suit of procedure of
khula in Pakistan on the ground of deep hatred for defendant who was not only
involved in personal scandals but also had a criminal record. Family Court
decreed the suit of procedure of khula in Pakistan in favor of wife on the
basis of Khula subject to return of gold ornaments and Rs.1000/- received by
her from defendant as dower at the time of marriage. Judgment and decree passed
by Family Court was modified to the extent that condition of return of dower
had been dispensed with. Plaintiff was a virgin lady less than 20 years old and
she was lured into marriage by defendant even though he had contracted two
marriages earlier. Plaintiff admitted that she had developed aversion to him
but offered no explanation for such aversion procedure of Divorce in Pakistan was upheld.
Comments
Post a Comment